GOOVIS Lite - 3D HD Headsets OLED Display Goggles Glasses, Built-in Adjustment Hyperopia & Myopia Lens Compatible with PC, Smart Phone, Set-top Box, UAV

an improvement in goggles, but field of view is too narrow for an immersive experience, plus no speakers add more cumbersome add ons, already tethered to the too short HDMI cable even with the included add on. pretty solid, but we'll see how it holds up over time with day to day use. price point needs to be in the $200 area to make it worth it. had higher hopes.

This new product LITE S has a good price-performance ratio! Support left and right 3D.1、Size: When I got the LITE S, I was surprised that it was much smaller than I thought, and it was light in weight without any discomfort.2、No worries about myopia: You can adjust the diopter without wearing glasses (my myopia is 550 and 350), and you can adjust it separately to be clear.3、Screen size: The overall feeling is moderate, all the pictures can be easily grasped in the viewing angle range, and the watching is not tired, and the subtitles will not lose the details of the picture.4、Headset feeling: no weight-bearing feeling, no restrictions on sitting or lying freely. The earphones can be wireless and wired (wireless, D3 Media Player is required). Thick pads are still very useful.5、Playing time: about 6 hours, 3 movies. D3 has a slightly higher calorific value but it is very convenient to operate.6、Abundant resources. App or website, online or offline viewing are very convenient.It is definitely a gospel for fans who like films and videos, and the feeling of a movie theater is very cool.

Having being using this product for a while for 3D movies. Image qality is super clear. Feels like watching movies in a cinema screen. This is what I expected from a 3D product. I really enjoy using it. Great 3D product that I'd like to recommend to others.

I work mostly on text editing for various reasons. Mostly just a simple Linux terminal. I am going to be living a nomadic life for next 8 months, and wanted to explore a monitor less setup. Got this particular headset because of the supposed crisp picture, and ability to fine-tune the display. (the myopia and DP adjustment).* The picture is not sharp enough especially around edges of the screen to consider it to be on par with a standard 27" monitor. There is a circular field in middle with a very clear and crisp display but the sides are blurred.* FOV is pretty narrow. nreal has better/broader FOV. nreal probably had better clarity around edges, just that it doesn't sit very tight.* Meta Q2 was probably the better one among all, but its heavy.ALSO YOU WILL 99% get used hardware, which I absolutely hate, given how I am paying top dollars for the right experience.

The point where the head band attaches to the headset is made of plastic and broke from normal use after 1 year of infrequent use.Update: Customer service reached out and asked me to take pictures of the broken piece. I took the pictures and sent them in. I have not heard anything back from them yet.Update again: Customer service has not responded to any emails and has yet to acknowledge the photos of the broken hinge. This product has a year long warranty and I believe they are trying to wait it out.Do not buy this product. It is poorly made and will break, as if by design, after the warranty ends.

I bought this product because I was hoping for a way to reduce eye fatigue while gaming and watching TV from wearing glasses and looking at a screen that's entirely too close. It did seem to reduce eye fatigue (once I got it working), but it was finicky enough that I'm returning it and looking for alternatives that fit better.Pros:* High flat panel resolution provides great image sharpness.* HDMI input is broadly compatible with pretty much any modern input source.* Fairly lightweight and comfortable.Cons:* Mine seemed to be defective (flickering right eye from some sources some of the time).* No volume control (headphone output is deafeningly LOUD).* Optical quality is not so good (severe flare/ghosting problems, and yes, I did remove the cover stickers).* Fit against your face is poor, compounding the problems caused by the optics.* The flip-up feature doesn't really flip up far enough to really see around it unless you're looking down at the floor, making the design compromises arising out of that feature mostly unnecessary.* Tethered operation only (I knew this going in, but it's worth a mention anyway).-- Optical problems --I spent an eternity trying to get to the point where I could read closed captioning through this thing without my glasses. I eventually got there, but it was way more challenging than it should be because of a couple of significant design faults:1. These glasses lack any sort of adjustment on the part that touches your face. At all. You can adjust the forehead plate, but that's it. Folks with long eyelashes will find that you cannot allow the sides to touch your face without your eyelashes touching the lenses. This necessitates swinging it out a bit, which makes it unstable, moving easily relative to your face.2. The lenses are designed in such a way that if your eyes aren't close enough to the center, they lose sharpness on the opposite side. And they're not large enough to allow for the amount of play that occurs as a result of problem #1 above.As a result, text would be in focus, and then a minute or two later, it would be blurry again. It wasn't until I realized that the lenses were getting decentered that I figured out how to deal with it, but the inability to keep the glasses centered properly over my eyes caused significant problems.I was also disappointed that this device doesn't appear to provide any way to adjust the convergence for 2D images to avoid eye fatigue. This should be a pretty simple thing to do (in software, even, albeit only to a certain degree).But the biggest problem with the optics in this device is that it has a serious internal ghosting problem. I guess they didn't use antireflective coatings on some of the lens elements, and as a result, you can see reflections that cause eye fatigue. Just to be clear, I'm talking about internal reflections caused by the actual image that is shown on the screen, not reflections from external light sources; the visual artifacts occur even in a completely dark room.-- Fit problems --To fix the fit problems, the manufacturer really needs to make the following changes:* Make the nose piece be adjustable up and down.* Make the nose piece be adjustable from front to back.* Make the outer ring that touches your face adjustable with independent adjustments at the top, bottom, and sides so that they fit people's faces.* Ditch the flip-up feature entirely. The fact that only the top part of it is being held in place is a big part of why this thing is so unstable. If it worked, it would be cool, but it really doesn't, and that feature compromises the structural integrity of the entire design in terms of how it fits your face.Either that or make the lenses a lot bigger so that being off-center doesn't cause such a severe focus aberration.-- Other problems --Some other design improvements would also be welcome:* Add a volume control. This thing blasts audio out at maximum volume, and a lot of devices don't provide any volume adjustment when outputting over HDMI, which basically makes this thing's headphone jack unusable unless you buy an external volume control. All for lack of a couple of buttons.* Provide independent HDMI inputs for both channels. (This uses a single HDMI connection, and stretches the left half out to double width for the left eye and the right half to double width for the right eye, thus presumably reducing the effective horizontal resolution by half.)* Make the cable detachable. It scares me that the cable is a permanent part of the device. Cables are a wear item, and this one can't be replaced. That's fine in something inexpensive, but this device isn't inexpensive.-- Conclusion --I bought this because I really wanted a tethered HDMI solution at 1080p or higher. Were this product priced reasonably for that purpose — say 50% higher than 720p headsets, rather than 5x as much — I probably would have exchanged this defective copy for another one. I'd be willing to put up with its flaws at a hundred bucks or so.But the reality is that this product doesn't provide enough value for the money compared with other products on the market. It costs a hundred bucks more than an Oculus Quest 2, for which I could buy actual prescription lens inserts to compensate for my astigmatism and get much better vision, which doesn't have the sorts of fit problems that this product has, and which could provide untethered operation. Its only disadvantage, of course, is the lack of HDMI, which is a big downside for me. I have no idea what I'm going to end up buying instead.